In response to Brennan Vogt's response to 11-year-old Ben DeNardo:
It seems as though Mr. Vogt should critically analyze his own views as he does those of others. Perhaps Mr. Vogt "is just regurgitating what he hears from his parents and the media," as he claims the young Mr. DeNardo is.
Al Quaeda ran to Iraq? It seems ironic that we didn't attack Britain, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, etc. for allegedly having Al Quaeda members run to their countries.
Our government has openly admitted that there was no connection between Iraq and the atrocities of 9/11 or the operations of Al Quaeda. Do a little research on the Baath party, Mr. Vogt, rather than regurgitating the press releases from the White House.
Just think, if you were a terrorist organization, what would help you recruit more members? Possibly an illegal war, with ever changing justification that kills hundreds of thousands of civilians will help.
Mr. Vogt fails to recognize, or is unaware, that Halliburton, among others close to our government, profited largely from the Oil for Food program in Iraq, as well as dealings with other "Axis of Evil" countries that supposedly support terrorism and continue to profit largely with no-bid contracts, even after falsifying expenditures and ripping off the American people.
Mr. Vogt also fails to recognize that there were protests to the invasion of Kosovo, where, incidentally, a major conflict was already underway, while trying to compare apples and oranges. Ever heard of the Bush Doctrine? You know, the justification of wars of aggression as "pre-emptive."
It is disturbing that people like Mr. Vogt actually think corruption on a massive scale is the problem at the U.N., but couldn't possibly be a problem here in the richest country on the planet unless the political party they oppose is in power. And more disturbing, Mr. Vogt is a history and education major. It is too bad that children are taught the type of nonsense Mr. Vogt spews forth from "educators" as fact.